Hi there! Thanks so much for visiting our blog. Our authors, Amira Walton, Richa Gupta, Sepehr Motamedi and Trayonna Hutchins, are all English 101 students at the University of Maryland, College Park. We are all currently studying and analyzing the use of rhetorical elements within texts revolving around social movements of the 1960s. We chose the Hippie Movement because we were all intrigued by the expansive impact it had during its time. We found the amount of cultural influence it managed to have on its society, such as its music, its fashion, and its revolt against traditional practices, incredible. We decided to rhetorically analyze two opposing texts from the same time period, those being John Lennon’s “Imagine” and a news article written by Mark Harris titled “The Flowering of the Hippies”. The differing views on the Movement as a whole works to show just how controversial the Hippie subculture was.
Harris’ “The Flowering of the Hippies” describes the Hippie movement as a disruption that glorified the use of drugs, promiscuity, disobedience, and laziness. “Imagine” by John Lennon worked to advocate love, peace, and total equality for all of mankind. Harris dismisses the Hippie Movement as an ineffective waste of resources and an unnecessary revolt against authority. Lennon argues that the hippie movement had the potential to bring many positive effects to humanity. These contrasting messages have resulted in several conflicting perceptions about the achievements of the hippie efforts.
We decided to base the methodology of the blog on the presence of each of the rhetorical analysis within the texts. Some of the rhetorical elements were represented in both texts while others were stronger in one or the other. We found Kairos and Audience to be the most important appeals to introduce first because they are present in each of the texts. Kairos was relevant in each text because even though both texts were published around the same time, the emotional climate of each text differed greatly. At the time the article was published, the creation and cause of hippie movement was largely seen as a mystery to those who were not a part of it. Parents were confused as to why their children were running away. Those involved in the Civil Rights Movement questioned why the Hippies chose to waste so many resources. Overall, the movement was seen as a mass migration of young, middle-class, white people who decided to abused their privilege and blindly revolt against authority. When Lennon’s “Imagine” was released in the midst of the Vietnam war, the hippie movements was then seen as an anti-war movement that protested against global violence and corruption. We then meant to discuss Audience next event though Ethos is the next thing that appears. The Audience of the texts also works to show how much the texts clashed against one another. While the article was primarily directed toward those who didn’t support the Hippie Movement, the song obviously appealed to those who did.
In the following posts we compared the effectiveness of each rhetorical analysis, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses for each text. Ethos was much stronger in Lennon’s “Imagine” rather than Harris’ article. Lennon already had a great amount of extrinsic ethos and gained the attention of the public due to his association with the Beatles. Harris didn’t have a very long career as a journalist so his extrinsic ethos was rather lacking. Pathos was present in both texts, however it was more effective in Lennon’s “Imagine” since he manages to evoke strong feelings of unity, humanity, and hope from his audience through his lyrics. Harris uses his pathos through diction to evoke feelings of disgust, resentment, and disappointment for the Hippie Movement. Harris’ article wins the appeal for logos through his presentation of facts, evidence, and actual quotes from the event. Lennon purposefully left Logos out of the song, finding its simple appeal to his audience’s pathos to be enough.
We hope the readers of our blog take away the message of both of these texts, which can be summed up with the fact that it is important not to simply blindly conform to things you may not believe in. While these texts differ greatly, the one commonality is that each text is protesting something in its own way. Harris obviously did not believe in the efforts of the Hippie Movement and thought there was a more effective way to reach peace. Lennon protested the presence of war in the world and the constrictions of religion and politics in society. The act of protest and disagreeing with something that you may find wrong is something that should always be applicable.